Not Ancient Aliens: Rethinking the Origins Of Ancient Mysteries

As a psychic, when I instruct people on how to read objects, I advise them to forget what you intellectually know the object to be - color, quality, purpose, etc. Simply act as though this is an unknown thing of unknown origins. Let the object tell you what it is.

For this post, I will be asking you to give up everything you've been told about the world and how it was settled and when you let that go - the world suddenly makes sense for the first time ever! 

No more fitting intellectual square pegs into out-of-place-finds' round circles.

We get lots of out of "place/out of time" finds and "primitive" looking human remains that confuse and confound archaeologists. Some people, trying hard to fit these finds into our history will attribute it to visitation by advanced civilizations from outer space. They are partly right (advanced civilizations).

What if we were never visited by ancient aliens - but were visited by other civilizations that lived and evolved here long before homo sapiens?

Wisconsin, Peru and Nevada?

Let me begin with something you may not see coming - Wisconsin, Peru and Nevada and their similarities-

Wisconsin is an ancient copper mining site.  The Menomonie Indians of north Wisconsin possess a legend that speaks about the ancient mines. They described the mines as being worked by “light-skinned men," who were able to identify the mines by throwing magical stones on the ground, which made the ores that contained copper ring like a bell. This practice closely resembles a similar practice that was used in Europe during the Bronze Age. Bronze with a high concentration of tin indeed resonates when a stone is thrown against it. The legend might have confused the start of the process with the result of the process. Even so, S.A. Barnett, the first archaeologist who studied Aztalan, a site near the mines, believed that the miners originated from Europe. His conclusion was largely based on the type of tools that had been used, tools which were not used by the local people. 

Wisconsin is also a state of an enormous amount of animal effigies on the ground at burial mounds.  As well, Wisconsin coincidentally has had plenty of ancient giants - found at burial mounds.  

The dig site at Lake Delavan was overseen by Beloit College and it included more than 200 effigy mounds that proved to be classic examples of 8th century Woodland Culture (*a culture that adopted what it knew from a previous culture?). But the enormous size of the skeletons and elongated skulls found in May 1912 did not fit very neatly into anyone's concept of a textbook standard.  First reported in the 4 May 1912 issue of the New York Times, the 18 skeletons found by the Peterson brothers on Lake Lawn Farm in southwest Wisconsin exhibited several strange and freakish features.  Their heights ranged between seven and nine feet and their skulls "presumably those of men, are much larger than the heads of any race which inhabit America to-day."  Above the eye sockets, "the head slopes straight back and the nasal bones protrude far above the cheek bones. The jaw bones are long and pointed, bearing a minute resemblance to the head of the monkey. The teeth in the front of the jaw are regular molars." On 10 August 1891, the New York Times reported that scientists from the Smithsonian Institution had discovered several large "pyramidal monuments" on Lake Mills, near Madison, Wisconsin. "Madison was in ancient days the centre of a teeming population numbering not less than 200,000," the Times said. The excavators found an elaborate system of defensive works which they named Fort Aztalan.

So, Wisconsin has - lots of animal effigies, burial mounds with slope-skulled tall skeletons, ancient mining of copper by "people before the Natives" and legends by the local Natives of the "others." 

Let's move on through the Americas -  


Peru is a copper mining area, with findings of ancient giants (Peruvian red-haired, elongated skull people), local legends by Natives of ancient giants being there (red-haired, white-skinned giants who arrived by boats), and animal effigies (Nazca) -

Nevada has copper mining. It also has 14,800 year old petroglyphs (so far the oldest in America), finds of ancient red-haired giants, and legends by the Paiutes of their giant existence and torment in the region. 

Glyphs:  ("National Geographic" link) The carbonate ages, combined with an analysis of sediment cores taken from neighboring Pyramid Lake, suggest that the boulders were exposed to air—and thus accessible for carving by humans—between about 14,800 to 13,100 years ago, and again from about 11,300 to 10,500 years ago. In between the two time periods, the boulders were submerged, the scientists say.  Scientists say they have found genetic evidence that a first wave of migrants (*interestingly chosen term "migrants") crossed into the Americas from Asia about 15,000 to 18,000 years ago by slowly creeping down the continent's coasts.  A few thousand years later, according to the study, a second wave of humans (*now they differentiate with the term  "humans") entered North America, this time by slipping across the Bering Strait into Alaska and then crossing through an ice-free corridor into Canada.  

***BING! BING! BING! - Ancient giants from Asia headed by SEA much earlier in first migration, but "humans" later came by Behring Strait*** (remember that first wave of migrants with sloped heads? Later migration of what would become Native Americans?--see my prior posts on the right hand side regarding giants)

*NOTE:  If you look closely enough at the actual very carefully worded works of archaeologists and paleontologists, you start to note interesting and cautious wording that masks these "does-not-compute" finds. 

Whose Language Is It?

"Egyptian tomb in the Grand Canyon," 
"Viking Runes in Wisconsin," 
"Ogham writing in Arizona."

These comments are coming from the mindset of other countries visiting America before we thought they did, but this might very well be wrong.  

Technologies and languages "out of place" also line up with slope-skulled giants who cannot be explained. The one commonality in all of our cultures is giants. 

If we had pyramids in China and South America and Egypt, we had hieroglyphs and runes, stone buildings, mining, and seafaring, it wasn't being designed separately in isolated pockets around the world, it was being visited by the "originators" who spread it and it was eventually adopted by the locals who made it their own.

I propose that the giant culture spread its influence of technology and language around the world as it moved about and languages from other cultures were fashioned from the "original" language.  What we are finding in America is not out of place - for the original settlers - the giants.  This is not otherworldly, but to some it's more of a threat because it means that man cannot take credit for originality, but taking an innovation and running with it.


Perhaps "Runestones" of America is the wrong terminology. Perhaps the Norse were utilizing language they learned from the giants, as were Aztecs, Egyptians and others who started their languages based on the "leap in knowledge" the ancient giants afforded them.  Those languages were a reflection of giants' original hieroglyphics and so there are similarities depending on how much the culture retained the giants' own symbols.






Is it easier to believe that Vikings might have arrived with some off-style rune language and left it on rocks around American a thousand years ago up to almost 15,000 years ago? 

Or is it a much easier task to believe that a people who settled here before us were writing upon the rocks in the regions where they settled where there was water, copper, and ideal living conditions for what they sought? 

These white-skinned, red-haired, giants with rune-looking language are dismissed as "possibly Vikings showed up randomly in the Middle Ages." But, did Vikings stay and mine copper?  Were they truly 7-9 feet tall? Did the make civilizations around the Americas and have sloping skulls?

 

(ABOVE - Heavener Stone - Oklahoma)

(ABOVE - Bourne Stone - Massachusetts)

(ABOVE - Kensington Stone - Minnesota)

(ABOVE - Newberry Stone - Michigan)

(ABOVE - Spirit Pond Stone - Maine)

(ABOVE - Narragansett Stone - Rhode Island) 

(ABOVE - Shawnee Runestone - Oklahoma)

(ABOVE - Poteau Runestone - Oklahoma)

Who Built That?


Sacsayhuam

Stone buildings of immense size, stone walls one cannot put a blade between. These are the mysteries that haunt locations known for ancient slope-headed giants finds. Although archaeologists have to accredit any finds to the local Natives, they also readily admit, these building techniques did not jive with knowledge at the time the buildings were built, and that others, such as the Incans, imitated these earlier finds.  Interestingly, these finds were within what would later become the Incan territory in the area of Cusco, Peru.

At the museum in Cusco, Peru, experts reviewed this mummy and proclaimed, "Although the assessment was superficial, it is obvious that its features do not correspond to any ethnic group in the world."

Note:  Amazing stone structures built before man was supposedly advanced enough to make such massive and precise things happen and ancient giant skeletons in the same region??? 

Pumapunku 

This complex is beside the Tiwanaku site in Bolivia.  This is also the area of ancient giants finds - 

Based upon detailed petrographic and chemical analyses of samples from both individual stones and known quarry sites, archaeologists concluded that these and other red sandstone blocks were transported up a steep incline from a quarry near Lake Titicaca roughly 10 km away. Smaller andesite blocks that were used for stone facing and carvings came from quarries within the Copacabana Peninsula about 90 km away from and across Lake Titicaca from the Pumapunku and the rest of the Tiwanaku Site.


One last note is that Native legends around the world speak of ancient giants, they also speak of those who are more powerful gods who have knowledge. Quetzalcoatl is a great example.

 
Quetzalcoatl was related to gods of the wind, of Venus, of the dawn, of merchants and of arts, crafts and knowledge. He was also the patron god of the Aztec priesthood, of learning and knowledge. This serpent god was part of a triad of agricultural deities.

NOTE:  If someone brought you the knowledge to set up a civilization, build buildings and farm the land, would this all-knowledgeable person be a deity?  

Did man in his relatively short evolutionary period since Mitochondrial Eve and the departure from Africa (about 100,000 to 200,000 years ago) manage to discover - 

seafaring? 

agriculture?

art?

religion?

language?

hieroglyphs?

tools? 

mining?

architecture?

sculpting? 

Or did we imitate them from the "gods?" Those highly advanced evolutionary specimens that were giant-sized, had left Africa up to 600,000 years earlier than we, and on their path of discovery to new places, learned new ways of conquering the earth and adapting to climates, seas, and spiritual expression?

We know that homo sapiens stole tools from their predecessors, Heidelbergensis in Africa, who had made them much earlier.  We know that Neanderthal had a bigger brain than homo sapiens and his ancestor, Heidelbergensis left Africa around 800,000 years ago, but all of us modern day homo sapiens who came from Mitochondrial Eve left around 200,000 years ago. For a perspective, imagine how it was 1000 years ago compared to now as far as civilization and technology - now imagine that times 600!  That would be the difference in advancement between their descendents and Mitochondrial Eve's. 

These concepts may be unsettling, but much less so than some all-powerful aliens attacking our planet. It's quite obvious by now that homo sapiens own the planet and the technologies that we  were able to evolve at a mentally more rapid pace having rudimentary skills offered early on. This is like teaching a child to read at 5 years of age and then having him able to drink in books for years and years rather than having him try to figure out how to read and take many years to get to that point. 

We had mentors and examples that took care of the simple skills for us, so we could take it and run. Some people might think this threatens man's place on the planet and takes away credit for ancient sites from "Native People," "Vikings" or others, but it means that native people knew to take a concept and run with it and make it their own over time, from religions to language, technology to architecture.

With this point of reference I am proposing, all the "out of place" and "out of time" finds now suddenly make perfect sense. We were halfway there to explaining it when science accepted earlier migrations and Otamid skull types. Let's quite pussyfooting around researchers, and say what we all really know to be true -  there were giants upon the earth and they were our predecessors, teachers, mentors, and to earliest man - gods.

***Tomorrow, I'm very excited to have a guest poster, Sasquatch Researcher Karl Sup, on here.  He will be presenting his theoretical proposal for Sasquatch eye shine. This is a brilliant and perfectly feasible explanation.**